Title |
Adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the BOOST-2 perfusion substudy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, August 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00392-019-01537-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andreas Seitz, Kai C. Wollert, Gerd P. Meyer, Jochen Müller-Ehmsen, Carsten Tschöpe, Andreas E. May, Klaus Empen, Emmanuel Chorianopoulos, Benedikta Ritter, Jens Pirr, Lubomir Arseniev, Hans-Gert Heuft, Arnold Ganser, Eed Abu-Zaid, Hugo A. Katus, Stephan B. Felix, Meinrad P. Gawaz, Heinz-Peter Schultheiss, Dennis Ladage, Johann Bauersachs, Heiko Mahrholdt, Simon Greulich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Spain | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,454,522
of 23,153,849 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#500
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,892
of 344,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.