↓ Skip to main content

Canagliflozin and fracture risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
25 tweeters
Title
Canagliflozin and fracture risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes: results from the CANVAS Program
Published in
Diabetologia, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00125-019-4955-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zien Zhou, Meg Jardine, Vlado Perkovic, David R. Matthews, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Dick de Zeeuw, Greg Fulcher, Mehul Desai, Richard Oh, Roger Simpson, Nelson B. Watts, Bruce Neal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#594,542
of 13,536,645 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#383
of 3,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,818
of 229,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#22
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,536,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.