↓ Skip to main content

Plenty of calcification: imaging characterization of polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroradiology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Plenty of calcification: imaging characterization of polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young
Published in
Neuroradiology, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00234-019-02269-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek R. Johnson, Caterina Giannini, Robert B. Jenkins, Dong Kun Kim, Timothy J. Kaufmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,487,091
of 13,763,586 outputs
Outputs from Neuroradiology
#414
of 704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,675
of 249,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroradiology
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,763,586 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 704 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.