↓ Skip to main content

The Dysphagia Handicap Index: Development and Validation

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
253 Mendeley
Title
The Dysphagia Handicap Index: Development and Validation
Published in
Dysphagia, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00455-011-9336-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice K. Silbergleit, Lonni Schultz, Barbara H. Jacobson, Tausha Beardsley, Alex F. Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 252 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 17 7%
Other 49 19%
Unknown 76 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 21%
Linguistics 9 4%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Psychology 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 81 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2018.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#1,177
of 1,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,961
of 121,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.