↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Survivorship, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to improve adherence to surveillance guidelines in survivors of childhood cancer: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11764-019-00790-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veda Zabih, Alyssa Kahane, Natalya E. O’Neill, Noah Ivers, Paul C. Nathan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,609,909
of 13,751,259 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#301
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,220
of 249,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,751,259 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.