↓ Skip to main content

Distribution differences in prognostic copy number alteration profiles in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma cause survival discrepancies across cohorts

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 701)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
Title
Distribution differences in prognostic copy number alteration profiles in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma cause survival discrepancies across cohorts
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40478-019-0749-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toru Umehara, Hideyuki Arita, Ema Yoshioka, Tomoko Shofuda, Daisuke Kanematsu, Manabu Kinoshita, Yoshinori Kodama, Masayuki Mano, Naoki Kagawa, Yasunori Fujimoto, Yoshiko Okita, Masahiro Nonaka, Kosuke Nakajo, Takehiro Uda, Naohiro Tsuyuguchi, Junya Fukai, Koji Fujita, Daisuke Sakamoto, Kanji Mori, Haruhiko Kishima, Yonehiro Kanemura

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#504,061
of 13,532,334 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#23
of 701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,347
of 227,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,532,334 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them