↓ Skip to main content

Response to “Fallacies of Mice Experiments”

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Response to “Fallacies of Mice Experiments”
Published in
Neuroinformatics, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12021-019-09433-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenyu Gao, Alyse M. Thomas, Michael N. Economo, Amada M. Abrego, Karel Svoboda, Chris I. De Zeeuw, Nuo Li

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 63%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Chemistry 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,918,908
of 13,735,692 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#178
of 223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,178
of 249,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,735,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,508 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.