| Title |
Explaining the user experience of recommender systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11257-011-9118-4 |
| Authors |
Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, Zeno Gantner, Hakan Soncu, Chris Newell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 10% |
| Italy | 2 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 50% |
| Scientists | 17 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,012 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 1% |
| Unknown | 967 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 214 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 208 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 100 | 10% |
| Researcher | 84 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 4% |
| Other | 147 | 15% |
| Unknown | 216 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 431 | 43% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 90 | 9% |
| Engineering | 65 | 6% |
| Psychology | 44 | 4% |
| Design | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 101 | 10% |
| Unknown | 243 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,346,625
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
#2
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,901
of 173,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.