↓ Skip to main content

m-TOR inhibitors and risk of Pneumocystis pneumonia after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
m-TOR inhibitors and risk of Pneumocystis pneumonia after solid organ transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, August 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00228-019-02730-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maryam Ghadimi, Zinat Mohammadpour, Simin Dashti-Khavidaki, Alireza Milajerdi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,384,712
of 13,976,883 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1,354
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,935
of 252,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,976,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.