↓ Skip to main content

Preclinical septic shock research: why we need an animal ICU

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Preclinical septic shock research: why we need an animal ICU
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0543-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Guillon, Sebastien Preau, Jérôme Aboab, Eric Azabou, Boris Jung, Stein Silva, Julien Textoris, Fabrice Uhel, Dominique Vodovar, Lara Zafrani, Nicolas de Prost, Peter Radermacher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Lecturer 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#18,025,888
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#894
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,423
of 353,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#18
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.