↓ Skip to main content

Prompt Electrodeposition of Ni Nanodots on Ni Foam to Construct a High-Performance Water-Splitting Electrode: Efficient, Scalable, and Recyclable

Overview of attention for article published in Nano-Micro Letters, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Prompt Electrodeposition of Ni Nanodots on Ni Foam to Construct a High-Performance Water-Splitting Electrode: Efficient, Scalable, and Recyclable
Published in
Nano-Micro Letters, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40820-019-0269-x
Authors

Hongtao Yu, Ting Quan, Shilin Mei, Zdravko Kochovski, Wei Huang, Hong Meng, Yan Lu

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 6 46%
Materials Science 2 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,549,522
of 14,195,901 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#268
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,430
of 253,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,195,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them