↓ Skip to main content

Intraoperative fluorescence diagnosis in the brain: a systematic review and suggestions for future standards on reporting diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Intraoperative fluorescence diagnosis in the brain: a systematic review and suggestions for future standards on reporting diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00701-019-04007-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter Stummer, Raphael Koch, Ricardo Diez Valle, David W. Roberts, Nadar Sanai, Steve Kalkanis, Constantinos G. Hadjipanayis, Eric Suero Molina

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 16 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 36%
Engineering 2 5%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,492,622
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#394
of 2,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,799
of 361,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#29
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,172 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.