| Title |
Composite Effects of Cutlines and Wildfire Result in Fire Refuges for Plants and Butterflies in Boreal Treed Peatlands
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-019-00417-2 |
| Authors |
Federico Riva, Jaime Pinzon, John H. Acorn, Scott E. Nielsen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 21 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 11 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,223,628
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#160
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,441
of 362,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.