↓ Skip to main content

The Assessment of Cardiac Masses by Cardiac CT and CMR Including Pre-op 3D Reconstruction and Planning

Overview of attention for article published in Current Cardiology Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
The Assessment of Cardiac Masses by Cardiac CT and CMR Including Pre-op 3D Reconstruction and Planning
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11886-019-1196-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Liddy, Colin McQuade, Kevin P. Walsh, Bryan Loo, Orla Buckley

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,792,339
of 13,472,087 outputs
Outputs from Current Cardiology Reports
#219
of 575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,559
of 208,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Cardiology Reports
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,472,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 575 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.