↓ Skip to main content

A Randomized Prospective Trial of Supine MRI-Guided Versus Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
Title
A Randomized Prospective Trial of Supine MRI-Guided Versus Wire-Localized Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, July 2019
DOI 10.1245/s10434-019-07531-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard J. Barth, Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy, Keith D. Paulsen, Timothy B. Rooney, Wendy A. Wells, Christina V. Angeles, Rebecca A. Zuurbier, Kari Rosenkranz, Steven Poplack, Tor D. Tosteson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,126,560
of 13,612,446 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#815
of 3,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,297
of 244,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#63
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,612,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.