↓ Skip to main content

The exploration of relationship between land subsidence and landscape transformation

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
The exploration of relationship between land subsidence and landscape transformation
Published in
Natural Hazards, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11069-019-03685-2
Authors

Chen-Kun Chung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Researcher 3 25%
Student > Master 3 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 17%
Engineering 2 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#18,686,631
of 23,153,184 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,549
of 1,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,592
of 347,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,153,184 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,841 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.