↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of chromatophores as natural marks for delta smelt: the effects of life-stage and light intensity

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Biology of Fishes, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
Evaluation of chromatophores as natural marks for delta smelt: the effects of life-stage and light intensity
Published in
Environmental Biology of Fishes, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10641-019-00893-4
Authors

Gonzalo C. Castillo, Marade E. Sandford, Tien-Chieh Hung, Wan-Ru Yang, Galen Tigan, Luke Ellison, Joan C. Lindberg, Erwin E. Van Nieuwenhuyse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,760,310
of 13,444,619 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#579
of 1,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,961
of 192,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#5
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.