↓ Skip to main content

Clinical immunology and immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current progress and challenges

Overview of attention for article published in Hepatology International, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Clinical immunology and immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: current progress and challenges
Published in
Hepatology International, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12072-019-09967-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lifeng Wang, Fu-Sheng Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 67%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 67%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,264,169
of 13,454,351 outputs
Outputs from Hepatology International
#90
of 227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,702
of 197,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hepatology International
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,454,351 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 227 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.