↓ Skip to main content

Perianal fistulas and the lift procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Techniques in Coloproctology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Perianal fistulas and the lift procedure: results, predictive factors for success, and long-term results with subsequent treatment
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10151-019-02023-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. J. H. Vander Mijnsbrugge, R. J. F. Felt-Bersma, D. K. F. Ho, C. B. H. Molenaar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,573,451
of 13,537,097 outputs
Outputs from Techniques in Coloproctology
#211
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,581
of 237,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Techniques in Coloproctology
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,537,097 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.