| Title |
Assessing data availability and quality within an electronic health record system through external validation against an external clinical data source
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0864-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellen L. Palmer, John Higgins, Saeed Hassanpour, James Sargent, Christina M. Robinson, Jennifer A. Doherty, Tracy Onega |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 2 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,697,099
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#775
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,588
of 347,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#25
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.