| Title |
The influence of general self-efficacy on the interpretation of vicarious experience information within online learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41239-019-0158-x |
| Authors |
Natalie Wilde, Anne Hsu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 348 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 181 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 29 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 65 | 19% |
| Unknown | 179 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,582,590
of 25,019,915 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#191
of 420 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,887
of 352,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,019,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 420 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.