The First Computational Theory of Mind and Brain: A Close Look at McCulloch and Pitts' "Logical Calculus f Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity" - Gualtiero Piccinini https://t.co/Hh7ae6pdt8
@daniel_eth as with so many topics in this area, @gualtieropicc has a lucid and thorough discussion: https://t.co/28ylfy3iu9 it's very much coming from neuroscience - with interesting appearances from physicists and philosophers like Carnap, Russell, an
Thanks to @gualtieropicc, whose paper on the topic is what led me to reproduce the circuit in the first place! https://t.co/7vFLfE9zRg
@NicoleCRust Some excellent discussion of this paper from @gualtieropicc--see, e.g., https://t.co/ATPmG4vhZi
RT @karinavold: "Before McCulloch and Pitts, neither Turing nor anyone else had used the mathematical notion of computation as an ingredien…
RT @karinavold: "Before McCulloch and Pitts, neither Turing nor anyone else had used the mathematical notion of computation as an ingredien…
RT @karinavold: "Before McCulloch and Pitts, neither Turing nor anyone else had used the mathematical notion of computation as an ingredien…
"Before McCulloch and Pitts, neither Turing nor anyone else had used the mathematical notion of computation as an ingredient in a theory of mind & brain" 🧠🖥️ Great read & discussion in today's AI History reading group! @UofT_IHPST @uStMikes @UofTC
A first computational theory of mind and brain: a close look at McCulloch and Pitt's "Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity" https://t.co/28ylfy2KEB
The First Computational Theory of Mind and Brain: A Close Look at Mcculloch and Pitts's “Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity” - Gualtiero Piccinini https://t.co/54qlYa9HgB
@mraginsky That looks interesting! And this one by Piccinini is too: https://t.co/Zcp0Aow7Du
The First Computational Theory of Mind and Brain: A Close Look at Mcculloch and Pitts's “Logical Calculus of Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity” https://t.co/D5UlYxBIiI
RT @JKBye: @wgervais @BrianNosek @djnavarro @simonlilburn @DBsamuel_phd Yup! There is so much to learn from math/comp models w/o needing ex…
@wgervais @BrianNosek @djnavarro @simonlilburn @DBsamuel_phd Yup! There is so much to learn from math/comp models w/o needing experiments. Just look at the McCulloch-Pitts model of a neuron alone, and think how much was learned about computation just from