↓ Skip to main content

A reignited debate over the cell(s) of origin for glioblastoma and its clinical implications

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers of Medicine, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
A reignited debate over the cell(s) of origin for glioblastoma and its clinical implications
Published in
Frontiers of Medicine, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11684-019-0700-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaolin Fan, Yanzhen Xiong, Yuan Wang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 50%
Student > Master 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Neuroscience 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,102,698
of 13,635,031 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Medicine
#132
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,667
of 244,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,635,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.