↓ Skip to main content

Exploring content and psychometric validity of newly developed assessment tools for itch and skin pain in atopic dermatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Exploring content and psychometric validity of newly developed assessment tools for itch and skin pain in atopic dermatitis
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0128-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Newton, Amy M. DeLozier, Philip C. Griffiths, Jennifer N. Hill, Stacie Hudgens, Tara Symonds, Jonathon C. Gable, Jim Paik, Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Lawrence F. Eichenfield, Linda Abetz-Webb, Jonathan I. Silverberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 17 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#14,453,344
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#248
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,113
of 346,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.