↓ Skip to main content

A conceptual replication of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Criminology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
A conceptual replication of the Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS)
Published in
Journal of Experimental Criminology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11292-019-09371-4
Authors

James Bonta, Tanya Rugge, Guy Bourgon, Kayla A. Wanamaker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2019.
All research outputs
#12,097,638
of 13,628,925 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#241
of 256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,135
of 196,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,628,925 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.