↓ Skip to main content

The role of ecological and environmental conditions on the nesting success of waders in sub-Arctic Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in Polar Biology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
The role of ecological and environmental conditions on the nesting success of waders in sub-Arctic Sweden
Published in
Polar Biology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00300-019-02544-x
Authors

Paula Machín, Juan Fernández-Elipe, Johannes Hungar, Anders Angerbjörn, Raymond H. G. Klaassen, José I. Aguirre

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,019,035
of 13,415,438 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#228
of 1,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,496
of 175,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,415,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.