| Title |
PEEP titration in moderate to severe ARDS: plateau versus transpulmonary pressure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0554-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie Bergez, Nicolas Fritsch, David Tran-Van, Tahar Saghi, Tan Bounkim, Ariane Gentile, Philippe Labadie, Bruno Fontaine, Alexandre Ouattara, Hadrien Rozé |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 5 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 85% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 20 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,749,177
of 24,996,701 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#214
of 1,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,540
of 351,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,996,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.