↓ Skip to main content

Perceived Barriers in the Decision for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Results from a Representative Study in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
Title
Perceived Barriers in the Decision for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: Results from a Representative Study in Germany
Published in
Obesity Surgery, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11695-019-04082-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Luck-Sikorski, F. Jung, A. Dietrich, C. Stroh, S. G. Riedel-Heller

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,967,241
of 13,376,849 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#224
of 2,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,618
of 209,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#5
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,376,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,250 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.