RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
Interesting question - are thematic roles psychologically real? I'd like to propose look at this from the perspective of Reinhart's Theta System.
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct? | SpringerLink https://t.co/6z4Q7FhvTH
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?. Now out in print by @wugtask & @asifa_majid https://t.co/XfWOP9EnPd
動作主や受け手といった主題役割は普遍的知識の一部か,心理学的実在性を持たないフィクションなのか。心理言語学やイベント知覚,言語類型論,手話などのさまざまな分野の研究を概観。答えは役割によって異なり,動作主と受け手には強い証拠があるが道具役割は微妙など。https://t.co/uwHuFBuD0h
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct? New paper by @wugtask & @asifa_majid. https://t.co/XfWOP9VZdN.
RT @MPI_NL: Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct? New paper by @wugtask & @asifa_majid. https://t.co/XfWOP9VZdN.
Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct? New paper by @wugtask & @asifa_majid. https://t.co/XfWOP9VZdN.
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
Great work - a very thorough review! Have you considered exemplar accounts of these "categories" which (potentially) sidestep the problems for prototype categories that you set out, and are (arguably) better supported in cognitive psychology- https://t.co/
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
Very interesting paper! In the end, the question is always the same (at least to me): is abstraction a "real thing" or a methodological artefact?
RT @asifa_majid: With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some peop…
RT @tscottphillips: This looks good, and it's very relevant (imo) to language evolution, and indeed cultural evolution in general. It revi…
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
A really interesting study. Seriously: 📢 READ THIS 📢 #cogling
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
RT @tscottphillips: This looks good, and it's very relevant (imo) to language evolution, and indeed cultural evolution in general. It revi…
RT @asifa_majid: With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some peop…
RT @fernandaedi: Can’t wait to read this! https://t.co/M5g38pBzut
Can’t wait to read this!
cool stuff!! @SebastianSauppe @ErcenurU @GestureSignLab
RT @tscottphillips: This looks good, and it's very relevant (imo) to language evolution, and indeed cultural evolution in general. It revi…
RT @asifa_majid: With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some peop…
This looks good, and it's very relevant (imo) to language evolution, and indeed cultural evolution in general. It reviews links btw core cognition, as described by cognitive development researchers and others, with patterns of semantic structure observed
RT @wugtask: Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @as…
RT @asifa_majid: With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some peop…
RT @asifa_majid: With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some peop…
RT @asifa_majid: With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some peop…
Thematic roles are part of core knowledge - except when they maybe aren’t. Review in PB&R just published #openaccess with @asifa_majid https://t.co/i3UKJiznS2
RT @asifa_majid: With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some peop…
With the fabulous @wugtask "Thematic roles: Core knowledge or linguistic construct?" in PB&R. This one might get some people's blood pressure up. https://t.co/5pdSEZ1HwD