↓ Skip to main content

An exploratory study on the intergenerational transmission of dieting proneness within an eating disorder population

Overview of attention for article published in Eating and Weight Disorders: Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
An exploratory study on the intergenerational transmission of dieting proneness within an eating disorder population
Published in
Eating and Weight Disorders: Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40519-019-00745-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Claydon, Christa L. Lilly, Stephanie C. Zerwas, Keith J. Zullig, Danielle M. Davidov, Lesley Cottrell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,016,373
of 13,390,335 outputs
Outputs from Eating and Weight Disorders: Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#217
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,942
of 217,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Eating and Weight Disorders: Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,390,335 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.