↓ Skip to main content

Immunohistochemical assessment of basal and luminal markers in non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of bladder

Overview of attention for article published in Virchows Archiv, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters
Title
Immunohistochemical assessment of basal and luminal markers in non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of bladder
Published in
Virchows Archiv, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00428-019-02618-5
Authors

Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena, Alcides Chaux, Marie-Lisa Eich, Aline C. Tregnago, Diana Taheri, Walaa Borhan, Rajni Sharma, M. Katayoon Rezaei, George J. Netto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,254,186
of 13,366,323 outputs
Outputs from Virchows Archiv
#115
of 1,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,686
of 209,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virchows Archiv
#5
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,366,323 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.