↓ Skip to main content

Retained medullary cord with sacral subcutaneous meningocele and congenital dermal sinus

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Retained medullary cord with sacral subcutaneous meningocele and congenital dermal sinus
Published in
Child's Nervous System, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00381-019-04301-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takato Morioka, Nobuya Murakami, Akiko Kanata, Haruhisa Tsukamoto, Satoshi O Suzuki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#11,851,289
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,061
of 1,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,554
of 206,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#29
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,505 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.