↓ Skip to main content

Plasma (1 → 3)-β-d-glucan and suPAR levels correlate with neurocognitive performance in people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy: a CHARTER analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroVirology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
Title
Plasma (1 → 3)-β-d-glucan and suPAR levels correlate with neurocognitive performance in people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy: a CHARTER analysis
Published in
Journal of NeuroVirology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13365-019-00775-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Gianella, Scott L. Letendre, Jennifer Iudicello, Donald Franklin, Thaidra Gaufin, Yonglong Zhang, Magali Porrachia, Milenka Vargas-Meneses, Ronald J. Ellis, Malcolm Finkelman, Martin Hoenigl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2019.
All research outputs
#2,963,750
of 13,376,849 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroVirology
#91
of 647 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,801
of 213,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroVirology
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,376,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 647 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.