↓ Skip to main content

Performance of the CMIP5 models in simulating the Arctic Oscillation during boreal spring

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Performance of the CMIP5 models in simulating the Arctic Oscillation during boreal spring
Published in
Climate Dynamics, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00382-019-04792-3
Authors

Shangfeng Chen, Renguang Wu, Wen Chen, Linye Song

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#11,851,298
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,474
of 3,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,554
of 206,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#113
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.