↓ Skip to main content

High occurrence of antihistamine resistance in patients with recurrent idiopathic angioedema

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
High occurrence of antihistamine resistance in patients with recurrent idiopathic angioedema
Published in
Clinical and Translational Allergy, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13601-019-0274-7
Authors

Zonne L. M. Hofman, Nikki van West, C. Erik Hack, André C. Knulst, Coen Maas, Heike Röckmann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2019.
All research outputs
#10,627,735
of 13,352,827 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#352
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,366
of 206,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,352,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them