↓ Skip to main content

Content validity of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 electronic patient-reported outcome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Content validity of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire version 2.1 electronic patient-reported outcome
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41687-019-0138-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca M. Speck, Huda Shalhoub, David W. Ayer, Janet H. Ford, Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Elizabeth N. Bush

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#5,776,836
of 19,040,944 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#86
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,372
of 273,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,040,944 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them