↓ Skip to main content

First- and Second-Generation Temporary Implantable Nitinol Devices As Minimally Invasive Treatments for BPH-Related LUTS: Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Current Urology Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
Title
First- and Second-Generation Temporary Implantable Nitinol Devices As Minimally Invasive Treatments for BPH-Related LUTS: Systematic Review of the Literature
Published in
Current Urology Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11934-019-0912-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniele Amparore, Sabrina De Cillis, Gabriele Volpi, Enrico Checcucci, Matteo Manfredi, Ivano Morra, Michele Di Dio, Cristian Fiori, Francesco Porpiglia

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,852,296
of 13,317,108 outputs
Outputs from Current Urology Reports
#167
of 342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,237
of 189,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Urology Reports
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,317,108 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.