↓ Skip to main content

The effect of procedural injustice during emergency 911 calls: a factorial vignette-based study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Criminology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
Title
The effect of procedural injustice during emergency 911 calls: a factorial vignette-based study
Published in
Journal of Experimental Criminology, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11292-019-09369-y
Authors

Michaela Flippin, Michael D. Reisig, Rick Trinkner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,235,962
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#67
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,200
of 208,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Criminology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.