| Title |
Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0553-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jean-Pierre Quenot, Julie Helms, Abderrahmane Bourredjem, Auguste Dargent, Ferhat Meziani, Julio Badie, Gilles Blasco, Gaël Piton, Gilles Capellier, Chaouki Mezher, Jean-Michel Rebibou, Abdelouaid Nadji, Thomas Crepin, Saber Davide Barbar, Camille Fleck, Amélie Cransac, Mathieu Boulin, Christine Binquet, Agnès Soudry-Faure, Rémi Bruyère |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Russia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 19% |
| Researcher | 7 | 15% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,167,620
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#748
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,367
of 348,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.