| Title |
Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Radiology, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00330-019-06331-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thierry Lefebvre, Claire Wartelle-Bladou, Philip Wong, Giada Sebastiani, Jeanne-Marie Giard, Hélène Castel, Jessica Murphy-Lavallée, Damien Olivié, André Ilinca, Marie-Pierre Sylvestre, Guillaume Gilbert, Zu-Hua Gao, Bich N. Nguyen, Guy Cloutier, An Tang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| India | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 5 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 33 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 36% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,695,028
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from European Radiology
#397
of 4,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,094
of 347,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Radiology
#10
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.