↓ Skip to main content

Correction to: Simultaneous observation of auroral substorm onset in Polar satellite global images and ground-based all-sky images

Overview of attention for article published in Earth, Planets and Space, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
Title
Correction to: Simultaneous observation of auroral substorm onset in Polar satellite global images and ground-based all-sky images
Published in
Earth, Planets and Space, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40623-019-1053-3
Authors

Akimasa Ieda, Kirsti Kauristie, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Yukinaga Miyashita, Harald U. Frey, Liisa Juusola, Daniel Whiter, Masahito Nosé, Matthew O. Fillingim, Farideh Honary, Neil C. Rogers, Yoshizumi Miyoshi, Tsubasa Miura, Takahiro Kawashima, Shinobu Machida

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#1,311
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,203
of 360,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#28
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.