@PeterCiszewski @DagnyTaggart963 Nothing to see here, I guess: https://t.co/n99j7Y49MH or here: https://t.co/zoMsyhoYyI
RT @Judyth: Were you trained in cancer research? Are you capable of reading this paper? https://t.co/F3rk2nbxnM HERE'S ANOTHER: https://t.c…
Were you trained in cancer research? Are you capable of reading this paper? https://t.co/F3rk2nbxnM HERE'S ANOTHER: https://t.co/mVi546ezHZ PHOTOS: https://t.co/BKmZbg6Nvh
@ClaraDarioLor @stacce2021 Misà che quello che non legge sei tu: https://t.co/gi4DIox4Aj
@ClaraDarioLor @stacce2021 https://t.co/gi4DIox4Aj Peccato che questo articolo più recente non la veda proprio così...
@nikopol @Flo_Clepsydre @faustvincent Un Tweet n'offre pas moyen de détailler. Vous-même simplifiez en donnant d'emblée pour «faible» une exposition non quantifiée. Leurs effet sur la santé d'expositions «faibles» font l'objet de polémiques. Illustration: