↓ Skip to main content

Bioprinting an Artificial Pancreas for Type 1 Diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in Current Diabetes Reports, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
Title
Bioprinting an Artificial Pancreas for Type 1 Diabetes
Published in
Current Diabetes Reports, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11892-019-1166-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juewan Kim, Kyungwon Kang, Christopher J. Drogemuller, Gordon G. Wallace, P. Toby Coates

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,403,282
of 13,309,801 outputs
Outputs from Current Diabetes Reports
#177
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,645
of 192,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Diabetes Reports
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,309,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.