| Title |
Common dandelion: a review of its botanical, phytochemical and pharmacological profiles
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytochemistry Reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11101-019-09622-2 |
| Authors |
Laura Grauso, Stefano Emrick, Bruna de Falco, Virginia Lanzotti, Giuliano Bonanomi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 3 | 17% |
| Argentina | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| San Marino | 1 | 6% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Philippines | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 50% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 23% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 45 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,026,056
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Phytochemistry Reviews
#22
of 362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,306
of 355,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytochemistry Reviews
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.