↓ Skip to main content

Pragmatic randomized clinical trials: best practices and statistical guidance

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Pragmatic randomized clinical trials: best practices and statistical guidance
Published in
Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology, December 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10742-018-0192-5
Authors

Victoria Gamerman, Tianxi Cai, Amelie Elsäßer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 13%
Other 3 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Unspecified 3 38%
Engineering 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,352,733
of 13,327,609 outputs
Outputs from Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology
#37
of 65 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,385
of 202,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,327,609 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them