↓ Skip to main content

“This institution was never meant for me”: the Impact of Institutional Historical Portraiture on Medical Students

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
51 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
“This institution was never meant for me”: the Impact of Institutional Historical Portraiture on Medical Students
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05138-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Fitzsousa, Nientara Anderson, Anna Reisman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Computer Science 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2020.
All research outputs
#457,246
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#398
of 6,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,968
of 269,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#17
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.