↓ Skip to main content

“This institution was never meant for me”: the Impact of Institutional Historical Portraiture on Medical Students

Overview of attention for article published in JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
57 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
“This institution was never meant for me”: the Impact of Institutional Historical Portraiture on Medical Students
Published in
JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11606-019-05138-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Fitzsousa, Nientara Anderson, Anna Reisman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2019.
All research outputs
#329,703
of 14,033,107 outputs
Outputs from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#277
of 5,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,799
of 254,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JGIM: Journal of General Internal Medicine
#15
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,033,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.