↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the effects of amantadine and ondansetron in treatment of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Medicine, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of the effects of amantadine and ondansetron in treatment of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis
Published in
Clinical and Translational Medicine, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40169-019-0239-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mojtaba Khazaei, Ashkan Karevan, Mohammad Taheri, Soudeh Ghafouri‐Fard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,274,774
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#182
of 1,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,957
of 364,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,369 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.