↓ Skip to main content

Is muscle mechanical function altered in polycystic ovary syndrome?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
Title
Is muscle mechanical function altered in polycystic ovary syndrome?
Published in
Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, July 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00404-019-05229-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ezgi Caliskan Guzelce, Damla Eyupoglu, Seyma Torgutalp, Fatih Aktoz, Oytun Portakal, Haydar Demirel, Bulent Okan Yildiz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,608,122
of 13,441,497 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#183
of 1,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,237
of 237,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,441,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.