Title |
The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0549-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jefta van Dijk, Robert G. T. Blokpoel, Alette A. Koopman, Sandra Dijkstra, Johannes G. M. Burgerhof, Martin C. J. Kneyber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 31% |
Spain | 2 | 13% |
Uruguay | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
Scientists | 4 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Researcher | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 15 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,293,759
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#531
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,245
of 355,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.