↓ Skip to main content

The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0549-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jefta van Dijk, Robert G. T. Blokpoel, Alette A. Koopman, Sandra Dijkstra, Johannes G. M. Burgerhof, Martin C. J. Kneyber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,293,759
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#531
of 1,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,245
of 355,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.