| Title |
Extracellular vesicles as circulating cancer biomarkers: opportunities and challenges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Medicine, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40169-018-0192-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. E. Lane, D. Korbie, M. M. Hill, M. Trau |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 238 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 8% |
| Unknown | 90 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Unknown | 99 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#355
of 1,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,345
of 348,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Medicine
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.